以台北为背景的剧集《妮波自由式》预计2022年6月开机，由庄凯勛饰演酒吧老板，与姐妹淘林思宇、陆夏、张书豪一同诠释都会里爱情友情的酸甜苦辣。 　　全剧筹备4年多，剧情致敬经典美剧《欲望城市》，也呼应时空变化加入YouTuber和Podcaster元素。林思宇白天是潮流网站编辑Pony，晚上则是Podcast节目「妮波自由式」主持人；庄凯勛则化身喜爱变装的MAMA，造型妖娇多变，在东区经营酒吧。张书豪则是继电影《女朋友。男朋友》后再次诠释同志角色，在戏中饰演网红经纪人，保守又相信真爱存在；外型甜美的陆夏性感与帅气兼具，职场上是抢新闻不择手段的娱乐记者，在情场则是撩妹高手。在外型上庄凯勛的转变最大，开拍前还特地去Drag Queen（变装皇后）酒吧见习，并透露自从拍完电影《美国女孩》后，头发就没剪，意外等到这部戏，笑说是长发把角色召唤来的。

游德是泳队的创办人，早年与妻子离婚（邓萃雯 饰）。大女儿游娴（陈文媛 饰）留在父亲身边，次女游颖（唐宁 饰）则跟着母亲生活。颖一直不喜欢自己的父亲与姐姐，更常常与他斗气，意想不到的是两姐妹同时爱上了队友Edwin（萧正楠 饰）。一向迁就妹妹的娴因此与Edwin保持了一段距离。 　　颖是游泳健将，但颖一直不相信父亲不修边幅的样子就是当年的飞鱼王子，于是她加入了与父亲对立的泳队。两个泳队都为了最终的游泳大奖赛努力，这时游德队里不够人参加比赛，娴虽然对游泳颇有研究，可是长短脚的她极少游泳。这时她希望妹妹能够回到自己的队里帮父亲胜出比赛。在姐姐的努力劝说下，颖才放弃了原来的队，加入到父亲的队里。 　　可是这时发现，颖的神经系统受药物所损，而药物正是原来泳队坚持服用的，但比赛迫在眉睫了……

威尔士的一群乡下佬为了从一群女同志吸血鬼手中救出他们的女人，把两个倒霉蛋放到荒郊野岭当祭品，结果好戏就此上演了……

一個閒來無事的下午，西門町裡一場毫無頭緒的追逐戰於焉展開…… 　　五個熱血奔騰、各有想法的年輕人，一個出賣身體、不談感情的少女，一個走自由哲學路線的老嬉皮，一次在西門町裡的奇幻遭遇。

挺短的一部泰国同志爱情喜剧，每集10分钟左右，挺有意思的. 　　剧情不要太care，主要是肉！

本片为Netflix 制作的8集古巴历史纪录片，从西班牙入侵，奴隶制度，自由斗士，讲到猪湾事件和导弹危机的冷战风云，是不可多得的关于古巴历史的大作，第一集讲述了西班牙入侵古巴的故事。

Ilan, an adolescent boy who lives in a farming community, is in constant clash with his father. He accidentally finds a stack of letters in the house attic, letters from his sister Dalya, that never reached him. Through these letters he learns the story of his sister's disappearance, and some facts about his life and his deceased mother. 　　He decides to run away to his sister. A complex relationship develops between the two. Ilan gets closer and closer to his sister's eccentric neighbor. The neighbor, an aging communist with a grand military past, runs, with Ilan's help, a battle against the authorities. 　　The story starts as a conventional adolescent drama but quickly turns into a fascinating and unexpected maturing journey.

Ginger Rogers stars in this rousing, patriotic drama as Jo, a young woman whose husband (Robert Ryan) goes off to fight the Nazis, leaving her home, poor and pregnant. In order to make ends meet, Jo takes a job riveting planes and then moves into an all-girl commune with three other women (Ruth Hussey, Patricia Collinge, and Kim Hunter). It's a touching illustration of grace under pressure as the ladies pool their money and share the household chores while nervously awaiting word about the fate of their brave husbands overseas. 　　The major irony is that the film's title, along with the concept of the women pooling their salaries and living together in a commune-style environment, prompted the HUAC to later use this film as part of their case in blacklisting writer-director Edward Dmytryk, despite the movie's patriotic premise. Whatever one's take on the film today, it was a big hit at the time of release and is certainly unusual from a historical perspective. No other film before or since has offered such a strange blend of genres: part wartime morality booster, part unashamed tearjerker, and part (perhaps) communist propaganda. As a curious piece of history, it is certainly worth rediscovering.